Bid and tender software, supplier and buyer
Every figure traced to evidence you already hold.
UK public procurement
The hardest market to bluff in is the one with a published rulebook, so it is the one the engine is proved against. CrowAgent reads both UK registers, drafts answers cited to the published requirement, to your own past bids and to commitments you have confirmed, and evidences delivery after award.
The same engine runs a private-sector bid. What changes is the rulebook it cites, not the standard of proof.
Refusal gate
Every pound and every percentage in a CrowAgent answer is computed from a commitment you have confirmed. If the commitment is not there, the claim is taken out before a named human reviews the answer.
Local supply chain spend. No recorded commitment sits behind the figure.
Statutory figures
How it runs
The gate is not a filter bolted on at the end. It sits between the draft and the human who signs it, and it is the only stage whose job is to remove work rather than produce it.
Find a Tender and Contracts Finder, read continuously and scored against the evidence you hold.
Fit, component by component, with the reason for each. Stated as context, never as a probability of award.
Answers grounded in your answer library, the published requirement and your confirmed commitments.
Any figure without a recorded commitment behind it is taken out of the draft before review.
After award, each commitment is tracked to the dated evidence that proves it, month by month.
Workstation tour
Six screens that appear nowhere else on this page: what a buyer publishes, what a supplier answers from, how a commitment is evidenced, how a response is banded, what the audit trail records, and the duties that get carried on a phone.
Buyer · Requirement builder
Criteria, weightings and the evidence each one demands, set against the PPN 002 minimum
The product
Five screens along the same contract: finding the notice, deciding whether to bid, drafting the answers, evaluating the responses, and proving delivery afterwards. The wording each screen carries is quoted beside it, because the wording is the argument.
Notices from Find a Tender and Contracts Finder, scored against what you can evidence today
Both UK registers are read: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Relevance is scored against the evidence you already hold rather than against the words in the notice, and the register a notice came from is named on the notice, so the trail out to the source is one click and not a search.
Relevance is a sorting aid. It is not a forecast of anything.
Fit broken down component by component, stated as context and never as a probability of award
The score is decomposed component by component, each with a band, a points total and a one-line reason you can argue with. What it is not is stated on the screen itself, in the product, where a reader cannot miss it.
“This is FIT context. It is not a probability of award, and CrowMark does not produce one.”
Award questions with their weightings, above a drafter told where every figure has to come from
The tender is split into its scored questions, each with its category, word limit and weighting. The boundary the drafter works inside runs across the top of the screen and is not a setting anyone can turn off.
“Answers are AI-assisted and grounded only in your own answer library, the published requirement and your confirmed commitments. Every £ and % comes from your engine-computed commitments and is never invented. A named human reviews, edits and approves every answer before you submit it.”
The passage that answers the criterion, located and cited, with the band left to a named evaluator
One criterion against one response. The supplier is quoted verbatim and the quote is cited to a section and a page of the response document, so an evaluator checks a reference rather than trusting a summary. The band, and the audit line under it, belong to a named person.
“CrowMark locates the passage that answers this criterion and shows you where it came from. It does not score, rank or recommend. The band is yours to set.”
What each supplier committed at award, against what they have since evidenced
Promises made at award are carried forward as measures, and each measure collects dated evidence against it month by month. The same view carries the next assessment date for each contract, which is the part of the duty that is easiest to lose track of and the hardest to explain later.
Each contract reads on track, at risk or behind against the evidence received, not against a projection. Suppliers see the other half of this: the same commitments, with the upload that proves each one.
Both sides of the table
The supplier writing the answer and the authority evaluating it are working on the same passage. It should be the same passage, cited the same way, on both screens.
Requirement
Supplier: Which measures apply
Authority: Publish the rubric
Evaluation
Supplier: Answer from your library
Authority: Located word for word, or dropped
After award
Supplier: Deliver what was priced
Authority: Audit the commitment
Run the real engine
If a figure cannot be traced, the engine refuses it. A generative tool asked for a number it does not have will produce a plausible one. CrowAgent does the opposite, and it does it visibly.
Worked example
Quantify the community and environmental benefit this contract will create.
The published question is read with its wording intact.
Every figure is matched to a confirmed commitment. One is not, and is dropped here.
local supply chain spend no recorded commitment dropped here
What survives is computed from those commitments, never generated.
The draft is counted against what it claimed: four asked for, three traced.
Each surviving figure carries its source, and a named person approves it.
4 jobs × £27,000 per year = £108,000 illustrative
The untraced claim is removed before a named approver reads the draft. A person signs off, not the software.
Plugged in, read only
Every source above is read only. We do not write to your files, change a setting in your tenant, or create an account.
Slack, Teams and Google Drive are separate outbound connectors, used to send a notification or export a file you have asked for. They are not sources we read from.
Ready when you are
Bring a live notice and we will run it with you. Access is limited and by request.
Access is by request. There is no free plan, and no self-serve signup; a 14-day evaluation trial is available on request.
No matches. Try a product name, a sector, or "PPN".
